Author Archive for admin

Web goes Mobile … no, honestly.

After you have been to a few “latest-buzzword-on-the-mobile” events, it is likely you become a bit jaded. Hype after hype wave breaks onto our shores but we are still missing a sizable audience changing its behaviour. Where is the move from voice and SMS towards mobile data usage (MMS, email, IM, WAP, web, widgets)? Last night, Mobile Monday’s panel handed out some refreshingly honest opinions without the inflated projections.

Instead the talk was more about:

  • what will constitute a truly mobile digital experience (immediate, identifiable/personal, always-on, context, location, social graph)
  • that Mobile 2.0 will therefore be different from but build upon Web 2.0 (like TV built on theatre and radio, web on print and TV)
  • the (slow) arrival of pricing models that are less about “bill shock” and more about “worry free use” aka data flat rates
  • carriers hopefully becoming “smart pipes” and sharing traffic and customer data, thereby helping to combine and improve mobile experiences
  • developing widgets which don’t require a browser in an open-standards-platform
  • social networking as one key experience defining 3G (like voice did for 1G and SMS did for 2G)
  • MoMo panel
    Mobile Monday’s panel, picture taken with iPhone by Halans

    Speakers included Gary Chan from Forum Nokia, Oliver Palmer from TigerSpike, Oliver Weidlich from Ideal Interfaces and Jennifer Wilson from NineMSN. Mobile Monday’s own wrap up can be found here.

    Big bold predictions for 2008

    NetX has opinions on the coming digital developments. Some are about strategy, some about technology, some are about our mothers. If you want to read up on how the next year pans out, look no further than this post. To mimic the style of Twitter, one of the most talked-about micro-blogging tools of 2007, we limited the predictions to 140 characters each.

    Twitter network visualization
    Twitter network visualization by Nimages DR

    Georgina
    Context aware mobile communication in ad-hoc environments filter into our lives. Coupled with SNT’s = a powerful form of real time marketing.
    Pascal:
    2008 will be the beginning of the end of the predominance of email. It will be replaced by social network messaging on mobile devices.
    Thomas:
    Facebook will be released in hardback. Yahoo! will calm down. There will be a worldwide pixel shortage.
    Tracey:
    The world will end in one giant POKE!
    Justin:
    Al qaeda takes over facebook followed by myspace, forcing the internet to cease all social networking sites.
    Kelvin:
    The US will have its first female president. Web 3.0 will become a cliché. I will give too much of my money to Apple, IKEA & Threadless.
    Janine:
    I predict there will be no more mobile phones. Just iphones.
    Allen:
    Expect the social networking bubble to burst. Data rates continue to cripple true mobile internet in OZ. My mum will finally “get” email.
    George:
    Facebook gains its own consciousness and systematically hacks into the American stock exchange thus forcing a global panic devaluing stock.
    Trina:
    We adopt the Japanese advertising model of bombarding users with five second ads and epileptic flashing lights
    James:
    My skin consists of LCD pixels and each morning I download a new outfit from the internet.
    Sam:
    iPhone chip implant inside your ear: Tap temple twice to pick up, once to hang up, scroll your cheek for more options.

    NetXmas “Give it to someone special”

    Yes, it’s the silly season – and it doesn’t get much sillier than this.
    For all your support and friendship during 2007, we’d like to express our sincere appreciation through song.

    NetXmas - give it to someone special

    We only ask for one small favour in return – your patience. There are megabytes of love coming your way, which could, depending on the size of your chimney, take a few minutes to download. So please, get comfortable, have a Merry NetXmas and give it to someone special:
    Watch and listen to our NetXmas

    For everybody who enjoys a look behind the scenes:Have a peek at our elaborate set and the no-expenses-spared filming. When you see it, it is hard to feel worried about Hollywood’s writers strike.

    Heavy TXTed - SMS projection at AWARD 2007

    Apparently some CDs didn’t see the funny side of being sledged by text (SMS) at the AWARD party at Sydney’s great arts venue Carriageworks on Friday. Guests could text comments with their mobiles that appeared in speech bubbles over pictures of the award winners.

    Bob Mackintosh from HOST being sledged

    Most of the comments were funny or in good spirits but as the night wore on and the alcohol kicked in the barbs became more poisonous.

    Glynden being sledged at AWARD 2007

    We knew this was an experiment and therefore going to be a bit risky (see a similar use at re:publica conference). And some people will always go too far. However we wanted to show that at events, technology and interactivity can come together in a very intuitive way. It was an opportunity for people to experience first hand how easy-to-understand and engaging an interactive idea can be.

    Video of the projection at the AWARD 2007 party:

    We set it up using a standard SMS gateway, drawing the incoming live data (text messages) into a flash file which constituted the projection of photos made a few moments earlier. This might have been the first time such technology has been used at an Australian event.

    Technical set up of SMS gateway and projection

    If you know of similar applications or would like to comment (sledge?), please drop us a line.

    Update:
    The SMS celebrated its 15th birthday two days after we invited to text to the AWARD screen. Of course, we hereby salute the engineers at Airwide for their brilliant addition to the world of communication.

    Hold that thought! Tools for retaining creative knowledge in an advertising agency

    The following is an article appearing in the next issue of CampaignBrief under “Future Watch”:
    This is an honest plea for more permanent creative knowledge within an agency. This might not like a sexy thing to work on, after all, a messy creative haircut goes well with a messy creative process, right? But tell me if any of the following emails sound like they were plucked from your own email inbox. If so, your agency might want to change the way it creates and learns in order to retain (or even export) more of their intellectual property. This is not about adding more processes but giving Creatives more headspace for their thinking. After all, advertising isn’t getting any easier.

    Feel like sending another redundant email?

    From: Art Director
    To: Studio
    Subject: new hero shot for in-flight magazine?
    “Guys, just got royally whacked by the CD for using outdated imagery, who knows where the new stuff is on the server? Who worked on it last and is that person still with us? C’mon help me out here…don’t want to look like a dud again.”

    Here Mr. Royally-Whacked dreads poking around on the server. His email reflects the first escape route: ask a colleague. So maybe the file will turn up on the server, because it simply got misplaced in an obscure folder structure. But what if it rests on the hard drive or as an attachment in the inbox of a long-departed co-worker? Quite likely, this Art Director will transfer the problem to an account person and waste their time finding the resource.
    Research shows that staff source between 50%-75% of information relevant to their work from other people. It also shows that more than 80% of an organisation’s digitised information resides on individual hard drives and inside personal files. This means that individuals - rather than the organisation - control the bulk of essential knowledge within an agency.

    From: Creative Director
    To: Traffic Manager
    Subject: utter waste of time!!!
    “Look, next time you dial me into all those reviews, make sure that “Director” and those “Creatives” over in Adelaide are up to speed with all the script changes we put in during our off-site. And what happened to those brilliant ideas for different online edits that I tossed at them last time?”

    Our CD produces (naturally!) brilliant ideas in a break out session, on the go or during a telephone call. His creative team unfortunately fails to catch the spark due to their geo-spatial separation. Additionally, nobody bothers to gather all those scribbles and assemble the various threads and ideas in one common place. The pitch work that started so ambitiously scrambles to the finish line with creative directions that only narrowly answer the strategic goals set in the beginning.

    From: MD
    To: Digital Planner
    Subject: facebook app?
    “am @ Group Summit, got hit w/ requests for “social networking apps”. You got some numbers, haven’t you? Remember some links you sent around ages ago. need to follow up quickly. Pls add more hot trendy stuff and stick into a PPT, get CD in on some high-level creative if possible. Thx!”

    Although this subject has been simmering for quite some time, knowledge about it hasn’t grown beyond the individual specialist. Links to benchmark campaigns or valuable data sources are spread widely across individual PCs or lost in those long streams of emails. When our digital planner gets poached by the next hot shop, our agency will be back at square one. Solution: hire the next digital gun for more money and hope he stays a bit longer.

    Look at your inbox and feel interrupted already

    These examples show how email is an unsuitable tool for gathering and retaining ideas and know-how. Emails are interruptive, difficult to keep in context and the older an email gets, the less valuable it becomes. Messages that scroll out of our preview window might as well not be there. Email doesn’t work well in distributed offices nor is it able to integrate outside parties in the collaboration – unless you call sending attachments back and forth an inspiring collaboration.

    Email is failing us as a tool for gathering and retainign creative knowledge

    Imagine cracking a brief with a team in two offices and several outside parties and freelancers, all information and assets are available to all parties, and comments and thoughts stay in context and accumulate continuously. Imagine searching across all projects based on over arching topics such as an industry or a channel and actually finding it quickly.
    Digital support tools for this are already available, for example Delicious or Google Notebooks (collecting and commenting bookmarks), ConceptShare and Slideshare (annotating and discussing scribbles and presentations) and Socialtext or OpenTeams (collaboration). All of these tools allow adding meta data (descriptions), linking and attributing different access rights.
    Most importantly though, this is a cultural change for how creatives work and has to be adopted and brought to life by the creative leadership first.

    Tools for creative collaboration

    The need for better knowledge management in creative processes is evident. Campaigns are becoming more and more sophisticated to succeed in a fragmented media environment. If agencies don’t learn from mistakes and successes, they can never be better than their current workforce allows them to be. And since any key person leaves an organization at some point, they take with them a wide spectrum of extremely valuable knowledge, including industry and target group insights, confidential data and relationships. If the agency’s creative knowledge then only consists of static files on servers, a bunch of emails and the rented brains of the current employees, it isn’t much more than a name with a reputation, a building and a fancy coffee machine.

    Fancy a new coffee machine?
    picture under CC by blmurch (photostream)

    Honey, I shrunk the website - Google gadget ad debuts in Australia

    Update: coverage of the launch in B&T here

    Online display ads in their current shapes have been with us for a while so it is always refreshing to see a new format appearing. This one provides a more complex and richer experience. It also delivers much more (dynamic) content in one place. And by this I mean more than the over-the-page, expanding leader board, mini game or video placement with dynamic text. While those executions already allow richer interactions than the traditional banners, they are still asking users to leave the page in order to follow up with their interest. That result of click through is how banners are priced and measured. But by demanding a click-through users feel a conflict: do I feel compelled enough by the ad to interrupt what I am currently doing?

    Now they don’t have to feel that pain anymore. To up the ante on display ads, Google allows their format Gadget Ad to behave like a micro site (not new). And after introducing them in the US, UK and Germany, they can now be seen in Australia and be shared on personal blogs, iGoogle, or sent around (now that is new). Have a look via CNBC report. This opens the door to affiliate marketing models by allowing users to participate in the revenue stream through impressions, interactions and transactions .

    Richness
    The Google Gadget ad allows useful applications incorporating data feeds, maps, images, audio, video, Flash, HTML or JavaScript in a single creative.
    Transferability
    Users can post and share the gadget ads anywhere.
    Full Interaction Reporting
    Site-by-site interaction reports tracking multiple actions are possible.

    Gadget Ad on an iGoogle home page

    As an “industry first” in Australia, NetX has produced a complex mini site in the format of the Google gadget. The current international Gilette Champions campaign website features videos, quotes and downloads by the global sport superstars Tiger Woods, Thierry Henry and Roger Federer. All of this content was shrunk to 300×250 pixel (all other AdSense sizes are possible as well though) thereby allowing users to interact with exclusive content of their heroes without leaving the page.

    Application Deficit Syndrome - or how many facebooks apps are enough?

    Now facebook apps are all the rage…with the clients. Via the back door of junior marketing people (who are entrenched in the social media scene), many marketing departments ask agencies like NetX to bring home the bacon. Namely, deliver a lasting engagement of users with their brand, product or campaign … inside their own social circles. While the entry barrier of using the f8 developer platform is set quite low, we simultaneously compete for limited real estate and user’s capacity and need for more apps.

    Will users stop experimenting and even reduce the number of apps in order to slim down and have a better experience with their favourites?
    In other words: will the majority of facebookers be getting a facial?

    Getting a facial on my facebook page? About time...
    Parts of collage by fczuardi under CC (fczuardi photostream on flickr)

    Is User Generated Content a trap for brands?

    Barbara Messer from AdNews has sent me questions regarding opportunities and risks of user-generated content (UGC) in campaigns. Her article appeared recently but here are a few of my answers in full:
    Is there anything wrong with using UGC in advertising campaigns? What are the boundaries – when is it clever, and when is it an invasion of privacy? What are the advantages?

    There is nothing wrong with UGC in ads per se. Many consumers would rather have a connection and a dialogue with their favourite brands than simply receiving a one-way, mono-dimensional broadcast. Serving their interest by letting them have an impact on the brand’s communication can be seen as a good thing. It is clever when a brand offers this opportunity because it is genuinely interested in what their consumers do, feel and say. It is disappointing if it is used to tick a fancy box (“Hey, let’s do it 2.0 style!”) or downright terrible if done to save money on agency fees.

    Photo by flickr user debaird in Chicago
    Photo by debaird under CC (debaird photostream on flickr)

    UGC in ads hold many promises, some of them being:
    - show how much you care for the target group’s lives, ideas and feelings,
    - gain insights for marketing, service and product development,
    - participants deepen their brand engagement,
    - a different and honest idea, imagery, copy or tone that cuts through the clutter of regular ads,
    - something of interest that a target group will want to talk about rather than the brand talking about itself,
    - acceptance inside the company that their brand is always subject to consumer interpretation: unmanage to stay relevant.

    Is Australia’s legal system set up to cope with UGC?

    It is not currently. Judiciary and legislative systems are slow to catch up with the pace of technology and the changes it brings to media consumption and publishing. Users publish for example photos in social networks without the consent of the people portrayed in it, they blog confidential information about their jobs and they are quick to hand over content’s usage rights without getting paid. The copyright and privacy laws in Australia will eventually change though and will affect how everybody can legally use services, upload, download and share content.

    Should advertisers be more hesitant in their use of UGC? Are agencies that embrace UGC putting themselves at risk of legal prosecution?

    Be hesitant seems like bad advice, as if staying away from social media might save the day, keep the brand intact and fresh at the same time. UGC is right if it fits the brand’s character and people feel strongly enough to produce content for it. Not being a lawyer in this field, I would assume that agencies are as much at risk as the client. While a legal assessment based on existing laws might give a campaign the go ahead, I wouldn’t neglect a very fuzzy factor: Does it feel like proper behaviour of a big company towards an individual? Campaigns rarely violate existing copyright or privacy laws, but sometimes create a conflict in a yet-undefined area. In those situations the ambivalence is always interpreted against the big brand (and their agency). The longer they then insist on having acted lawfully and start picking at legal issues, the more they tide turns against the campaign.

    Using content from users requires therefore an additional step in campaign planning: advertisers and agencies should know how to communicate and behave before, during and especially after the campaign runs. This means honest, transparent and one-on-one communication if need be. They have to know how they want to respond to negative reactions as well as overwhelming success. This means more than releasing a press statement. Without this plan, the campaign can become a creative flop, a PR or even a legal disaster.

    Too many UGC campaigns are currently hit-and-miss. Some are hard to measure or involve great efforts in initiating, growing and grooming participation. As an industry we will have to continuously learn from all of the mistakes as the clients’ demand for clever UGC and social media campaigns can only rise.

    Standards of Mobile Advertising - AIMIA Mobile Industry Group releases results

    When AIMIA’s Mobile Industry Group invited to a presentation of the new mobile advertising standards, we were naturally keen to go. Are interesting models and formats in place, binding definitions crafted to allow the market to evolve beyond experimental and low-reach or alternatively keep-it-as-simple-as-you-can measures?
    Mobile advertising definitely needs speed...

    Well, there are now AIMIA definitions of what constitutes mobile advertising, what banner sizes are recommended and many more technical guidelines that hopefully help agencies and clients to build satisfying mobile sites and experiences. Vodafone’s David Green declared that Vodafone will use the AIMIA definitions and that all traffic to ad-microsites linked to by banners on Vodafone Live! will not be measured against customer’s data plans. Those definitions and more of those customer-friendly carrier and publisher decisions will definitely help in making mobile sites and content more popular through advertising funding.

    But the examples of current mobile ads were fairly uninspiring as are the areas in which they advertise. 90-seconds free-to-air TV content with a DRM licence valid for three days, all for the price of $4.95: Compelling indeed. Hubert Kjellberg, Head of Content at Ericsson echoed that thought in his summary by saying that carriers will have to define their role. Are they re-sellers of ringtones and pre-packaged content or traffic enablers to the truly interesting circus of social networking and consumer-generated content? (the last addition not being from Hubert).

    Update: A lengthy piece appeared with Hubert in SMH in which we ad people supposedly drool just thinking about mobile advertising. Well, the precision targeting of users is something we will relish but let’s not forget that a mobile phone client might by comparison seem like a blank canvas compared to a facebook user.

    Living in Mel-BOURNE for one day - the Matt Damon visit

    As we anticipate the opening of “Bourne Ultimatum” (August 30), the official visit of Matt Damon in Australia two weeks ago gave us the opportunity to sneak in a small idea. Australia is the only country in the world that has a metropolis with the word Bourne in it. So Melbourne honours the Hollywood star with all the city officials pronouncing the name of their own city MelBOURNE. For one day only, of course. Newly sworn-in Victorian premier John Brumbie makes a start when welcoming Matt Damon on the steps of State Parliament.


    Catch their banter on SunHerald’s coverage of Matt’s visit here.